Scott Marlowe <scott.marl...@gmail.com> writes:
> 512M is still REALLY high for a 32 bit postgresql. Have you tried
> something in the 16Meg range?
Cutting his value for shared_buffers (currently about 800MB) might be
wise too. I'm not sure what the effectively available address space
for a win32 process is, but if there's any inefficiency in the way
the address space is laid out, those numbers could be enough to be
trouble.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
