Derrick Rice wrote: > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > > > > > > > Sorry, I don't know. I think the timelines are only there for safety if > > you have to fall back to the previous timeline, and to prevent timeline > > mixing. > > > Thanks for the helpful answers. > > Two follow up questions which, if they can be answered, will save some time > before I go testing random theories. > > Is there a way to bump a database up a timeline version without specifying > the exact timeline version of interest? Apparently doing a rebase from a > database which has incremented its own timeline from doing a recovery does > at least this. > > Is it possible to interpret the requested file and ignore the timeline > digits and provide a file from some other timeline? Or is the timeline mean > more than just the file name?
No idea. Sorry. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
