Merlin Moncure <mmonc...@gmail.com> writes:
> I think so too, but suppose we wanted to force the other plan anyways:
> select * from ps where (client_id, expires_on) >=
> ('123', '24.11.2010'::timestamp) and (client_id, expires_on) < ('123',
> null) order by client_id, expires_on;
A simpler way to force use of the other index is
begin;
drop index wrong_index;
explain analyze my_query;
rollback;
> I'd be curious to see explain analyze (not explain) comparisons for
> the 'wrong' index vs above. I suspect the plan is 'correct' for
> *most* of the data, or you cherry picked (or unluckily drew) a bad
> value to get your 22 times speed difference.
Yeah, it would be interesting to see explain analyze output for both
cases, and for a few different values of the expires_on date if this
one is unlike the typical value.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
