On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 1:22 AM, John Gage <jsmg...@numericable.fr> wrote: > There are features, are there not, that Postgres has that MySQL does not > have? > > I refer in particular to things like tsvector. > > Am I mistaken in this? > > John > > > On Jun 25, 2010, at 3:46 AM, Rob Wultsch wrote: > >> unless there was a specific reason to migrate > >
MySQL has several full text search solutions. The built in MyISAM solution is the best known, but there is also an engine for using sphinx. ... And there are features that MySQL has that PG does not. Index only queries is a massive feature. Pluggable backend storage engines are another. MySQL is also somewhat simpler to tune. Both systems can work well. Both have advantages. Both can suck. As has been just demonstrated, both have communities that suck at mingling with the other major open source rdms. -- Rob Wultsch wult...@gmail.com -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
