Hi Tom, > The rationale is "do what the SQL spec says" ;-)
can't argue with the standard ;) > I seem to recall a previous discussion in the PG lists Good memory ! Adding 'sql standard' to the search options helped, this issue seems to elude people every now and then, given (amongst others): http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-05/msg01457.php http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2006-11/msg00763.php http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2006-11/msg00527.php One might consider adding a single line to the end of 9.9 of the docs that warns for this behaviour and/or add the specific example....? Thanks for your help. -- Best, Frank. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
