Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> Personally I would reduce this section to > >> Don't. > > > Well, I would have avoided this mine-trap except we have this 9.0 > > release note item: > > Allow use of <productname>C++</> functions in backend code (Kurt > > Harriman, Peter Eisentraut) > > I'd be interested to see a section like this written by someone who'd > actually done a nontrivial C++ extension and lived to tell the tale. > As is, this is so incomplete that my opinion is it's worse than useless. > It gives people the impression that writing an extension in C++ will > be easy. When they find out it isn't, we'll get the blame.
So should I just comment it out and then when someone gets serious we can use it as a starting point for them? -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + None of us is going to be here forever. + -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
