On 29 Apr 2010, at 19:21, Oliver Kohll - Mailing Lists wrote: > The two plans (note I've been rewriting the field names for readability until > now but haven't here): > > explain analyze SELECT year, sum(c) over (order by year) > FROM ( > SELECT extract(year from a56b7a8d6de03f67b) AS year, > count(a10e4ab8863c199f1) AS c > FROM a2e9a7e9e257153de > GROUP BY extract(year from a56b7a8d6de03f67b) > ) as subq;
Oh my, how can you work with such column and table names? You and any colleagues you may have will probably appreciate having a few views over those tables that translate that gibberish to human readable stuff. You could go further and make those views updatable (by means of a few rules), but then you run the risk that colleagues start to hug you... Alban Hertroys -- Screwing up is an excellent way to attach something to the ceiling. !DSPAM:737,4bdaabce10411378620886! -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
