> Whoa! Sounds like a slow disk IO subsystem, or the > inability to take > advantage of a fast one. > > PostgreSQL's PITR replication is already a working part of > pgsql. Hot > stanbys are due in 9.0, and should produce no more load > than they > already do in 8.4 or 8.3. Have you tried setting up > PITR on pg 8.4 to > see how it impacts your server's performance? >
No I haven't. I'm using MySQL right now. But I want to learn more about Postgresql's Hot Standby and see if it offers a better replication solution. Can anyone share their experience about Postgresql replication performance impact? Thanks. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
