Tom Lane wrote:
> Merlin Moncure <mmonc...@gmail.com> writes:
> > *) csv is supposed to be CRLF *always*.  We do not do this.  We do
> > however read different types of newlines.  So we are a 4180 reader but
> > not an emitter.  Not so sure if I think changing this is a good idea
> > though without exposing a knob.
> 
> Given the lack of field complaints, I think changing this would be a
> pretty terrible idea; much more likely to break things than fix them.
> It's not like that RFC has huge recognition as The Standard.

Should we document we support the standard?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <br...@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

Reply via email to