> Alban Hertroys wrote: > > It would help if you'd show us what result you expect from ordering the > above. > > Most people would order this by path I think. However that doesn't match > your sort column and I can't think of any method that would give results > in such an arbitrary order as you seem to be specifying - unless you set > it by hand like you do. > > Alban Hertroys > > -- > Screwing up is an excellent way to attach something to the ceiling. > > > !DSPAM:737,4bcc9b1e10415135793547! > > > Yes, you have right, for example I create new idea of stored data in table:
here is a paste: http://pastebin.com/4pX5cM7j -- never expired link As you can see, I have noodes with numeric type, those nodes present a sort position by self. And If I type ORDER BY path; I will have data like I want to have: http://pastebin.com/R4z01LC5 -- never expired link Again, you can see now grouped data in his nodes, this is the outputed data I wanted. If you know better way to make this WITHOUT recursive queries, give me a hint. -- Regards, cojack. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
