Tom Lane wrote:
No, but trying to build against a non-self-consistent set of files is
bad.  You really need a pg_config.h that matches the original build of
the server, and you haven't got that.  I think Greg's point is that
trying to reverse-engineer that file is considerably more risky than
building your own packages from scratch.
and once again totally concurring with what you are saying... for laughs, I went ahead and tweaked the fields in a copy of the 32bit pg_config.h that I suspected were obviously wrong, and rebuilt my module against that, and it got through most of the pl/java test suite.


so I know I'm on the right track, I just need the right pg_config.h from Bjorn and all will be well with my world.



--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

Reply via email to