Hey Kretschemer, the has_table_privilege  function returns true in following
situation as well which is wrong.

techdb=> select pc.relname, pc.relacl from pg_class pc, pg_namespace pn
where pc.relnamespace=pn.oid and pn.nspname='techdb' and
pc.relname='techtable';
   relname    |                            relacl
--------------+--------------------------------------------------------------
 techtable    | {postgres=arwdDxt/postgres,=ar/postgres,user1=ar/postgres}
(1 row)
techdb=> SELECT has_table_privilege('user1', 'techdb.techtable', 'SELECT,
UPDATE, DELETE, TRUNCATE, REFERENCES, TRIGGER');
 has_table_privilege
---------------------
 t
(1 row)
techdb=>
Note that user1 has only insert and select permissions on techtable but
still has_table returns true for all permissions. Am I missing anything?

Thanks,
Dipti

On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 4:16 PM, dipti shah <shahdipti1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Okay. Thanks.
>
> Dipti.
>
>   On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 3:20 PM, A. Kretschmer <
> andreas.kretsch...@schollglas.com> wrote:
>
>> In response to dipti shah :
>> > Thanks Kretschmer but I have seen those function. The below query
>> returns error
>> > but you could see that 'user1' has ALL permissions on table 'techtable'.
>> >
>> > techdb=# SELECT has_table_privilege('user1', 'techtable', 'ALL');
>> > ERROR:  unrecognized privilege type: "ALL"
>> >
>> > Do I have to run this command as below which includes all permissions
>> > explicitly? Did I miss anything?
>>
>> Right, you have to name all privileges.
>>
>> The desired access privilege type is specified by a text string, which
>> must evaluate to one of the values SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE,
>> TRUNCATE, REFERENCES, or TRIGGER.
>>
>> Andreas
>> --
>> Andreas Kretschmer
>> Kontakt:  Heynitz: 035242/47150,   D1: 0160/7141639 (mehr: -> Header)
>> GnuPG: 0x31720C99, 1006 CCB4 A326 1D42 6431  2EB0 389D 1DC2 3172 0C99
>>
>> --
>> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
>> To make changes to your subscription:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>>
>
>

Reply via email to