On Mar 9, 2010, at 11:00 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Dan Fitzpatrick <d...@eparklabs.com> writes:
The rule is creating a new value from the sequence a_a_id_seq for
"new.options_id" on each UPDATE call. How do I use the variable
new.options_id in the three update statements without incrementing
the
sequence again?
You don't. This is one of the major disadvantages of rules: they're
macros, not functions, and as such don't have any real local
variables.
You should probably look into whether you can do what you want with a
trigger instead of a rule.
regards, tom lane
Can you have a trigger on a view? I thought you can only use rules
with a view.
As another option, can you pass "NEW" (the incoming data record) as a
variable to a function or does each field in NEW have to be explicitly
passed to the function?
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
