2010/1/27 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>: > Vincenzo Romano <vincenzo.rom...@notorand.it> writes: >> But why still on separate schema? >> I'd rather put them all in the public one, so you don't need the "pst." >> anymore. >> Just like (most of) all other contrib modules ... > > If this were to get committed, it would definitely get made to look just > like all the other contrib modules; so forget the separate schema. > > But what I'm wondering is whether it should be contrib or in core. > Is there some potential reason why someone might not want it installed?
I'm currently using it to solve a number of problems with dynamic SQL code in PL/PgSQL functions. I'm using "EXECUTE psd.format(...)" in order to overcome a number of "limitations" with the EXECUTE ... USING form I was not able to solve otherwise. Something known in the past as "wishful thinking"! :-) -- Vincenzo Romano NotOrAnd Information Technologies NON QVIETIS MARIBVS NAVTA PERITVS -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
