On Tuesday 12 January 2010 9:38:06 pm Vincenzo Romano wrote:
> The static binding worked fine in the second EXECUTE USING statement but
> not in the first one.
> I still think that it's weird more than wishful.
> I can work it around, though.
>
> Il giorno 12 gen, 2010 4:13 p., "Tom Lane" <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> ha scritto:
>
> Vincenzo Romano <vincenzo.rom...@notorand.it> writes:
> > I don't think so. Those variables should be evaluated with the USING >
>
> *before* the actual executi...
> Unfortunately, that's just wishful thinking, not how EXECUTE USING
> actually works.
>
> regards, tom lane
Without the whole function it is hard to say. Given the error I would say it is
a quoting issue. The table name is being substituted for, the other parameters
are not. It acts like the add_check clause is not part of the EXECUTE statement
and is just being passed through verbatim.
ERROR: there is no parameter $1
CONTEXT: SQL statement "
alter table public.test_part_2 add check(
data>=$1::timestamp and data<$2::timestamp and maga=$3 )
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.kla...@gmail.com
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
