On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Craig Ringer <cr...@postnewspapers.com.au> wrote: > On 16/12/2009 9:07 AM, Scott Marlowe wrote: > >> I'd also recommend moving off of OSX as you're using a minority OS as >> far as databases are concerned, and you won't have a very large >> community to help out when things do go wrong. > > It sounds like PostgreSQL is being used as a DB bundled with an app - not > quite embedded, but as close as Pg gets. Right, OP? > > If so, they wouldn't be moving off Mac OS X, they'd be moving off Pg. > > While Pg doesn't seem to be hugely used on Mac OS X as a production > environment for running dedicated database servers, it should still work > safely and with acceptable performance. If it doesn't then good problem > reports will help improve that. So I for one encourage them to stick with Pg > and stay in touch on the list. They shouldn't have issues now that they've > got OS X honouring fsync, and if they do then it'd be good to hear about it.
Oh, I completely missed that they didn't have fsync working right. Yeah, I agree then, embedded on OSX, fsync working, that's reasonable. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
