On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Greg Smith <g...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Dave is talking about Greg Stark here, lest anyone credit me for something I Err, yes indeed. Sorry. Keep forgetting that postgresql.org is the only place in the world with more Gregs than Daves... > wasn't involved in. I just updated the shared_buffers section of "Tuning > Your PostgreSQL Server" to reflect Dave's comments and to generally clean up > the Windows suggestions here. I recall seeing some comments in the past > that suggested earlier systems started to fall off at closer to 64MB rather > than 128MB, tweaked the wording there accordingly. 8MB working out best is > really unexpected though; I'd like to know what you were doing where *that* > was the optimal setting. Thanks. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
