In article <87tywid19x....@hi-media-techno.com>,
Dimitri Fontaine <dfonta...@hi-media.com> writes:
> The BTree opclass is not made to resist to overlapping data. Maybe in
> this case though we could say that 12 contains less elements than 1 so
> it's less than 1. Here's a test to redefine the pr_cmp() operator in
> term of that, as a patch against current CVS (which is 1.0.0).
> Can you test with this version and maybe better data set?
Looks good.
> Note that as said earlier the indexing you need to speed up queries is
> the GiST one, but it could be you want the PK constraint noneless.
Indeed - I think it's a good thing to be able to prevent something
like
INSERT INTO myrecords (record) VALUES ('12'), ('12');
Oh, here's another gripe: how about renaming README.txt to README.prefix
and removing TESTS.* from "make install"?
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
