It's true that PostGIS is server side, so that's not really an issue. As far as ODBC is concerned I'm just working from the assumption that a native link is generally preferable. If anyone tells me that the psql ODBC link has the same features/performance that's fine with me.....? :)
Anders On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Sam Mason <s...@samason.me.uk> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 09:47:48AM +0100, Anders Moe wrote: > > We're trying to get our 64 bt windows application to use postgresql, > which > > means I have to #include stuff from psql and link to 64 bit versions of > the > > libs. Which do not seem to exist. > > > > Spesifically I need to get Qt compiled with psql (and eventually > postGIS). > > Why does Postgres need to be 64bit, couldn't you go through the windows > ODBC layer if you want 64 bit client support? Also, isn't PostGIS just > server side and hence you shouldn't have to worry about it client side? > > -- > Sam http://samason.me.uk/ > > -- > Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general > -- ________________________________________________________ Anders Moe Technical Manager Geocap w: +47 22 95 56 66 anders....@geocap.no ________________________________________________________
