Filip Rembiałkowski escribió: > 2009/10/6 Richard Huxton <d...@archonet.com> > > > > > Are we looking down the wrong end of the telescope here? What if we had > > something more like the "C" binding for functions: > > > > CREATE FUNCTION foo(int,text,int) AS 'MyModule::internal_foo' LANGUAGE > > plperl; > > > If you want inter-function calls you use internal_foo. > > > this really would be a great feature for many plperl users. > ( I'm not sure how it breaks current PL model in postgres)
This would be a pain for dumps, because the user would have to install the modules separately. Maybe we could have a different language (say plperl2 for lack of a better name) that could work this way; if you really wanted to do this, you could. Having plperl functions as separate files would be great for stuff like syntax coloring in editors. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
