Le mercredi 5 août 2009 à 10:13:44, durumd...@gmail.com a écrit : > [...] > So please help me with your experience: what is the best solution, what is > the possible problem that make mistakes with this plan, and how to realize > it easily? >
You can try check_postgres.pl Perl script. The same_schema action seems to be what you need. Here is a little example: guilla...@laptop:~$ createdb db1 guilla...@laptop:~$ psql -c "CREATE TABLE t1(id integer);" db1 CREATE TABLE guilla...@laptop:~$ psql -c "CREATE TABLE t2(id integer, c text);" db1 CREATE TABLE guilla...@laptop:~$ createdb db2 guilla...@laptop:~$ psql -c "CREATE TABLE t1(id integer);" db2 CREATE TABLE So, db1 with two tables and db2 with one only. guilla...@laptop:~$ LANG=C check_postgres.pl --action same_schema --dbname db1 --dbname2 db2 POSTGRES_SAME_SCHEMA CRITICAL: DB "db1 => db2" Databases were different. Items not matched: 1 | time=0.01 Table in 1 but not 2: public.t2 It works. Now I add the missing table: guilla...@laptop:~$ psql -c "CREATE TABLE t2(id integer, c text);" db2 CREATE TABLE guilla...@laptop:~$ LANG=C check_postgres.pl --action same_schema --dbname db1 --dbname2 db2 POSTGRES_SAME_SCHEMA OK: DB "db1 => db2" Both databases have identical items | time=0.01 Works too. Works great actually :) It works also with the other objects of the database. Regards. -- Guillaume. http://www.postgresqlfr.org http://dalibo.com -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
