"Joshua D. Drake" <j...@commandprompt.com> writes:
> On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 19:16 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Oh? You think RH/Cent is going to change that default now? Think again.
> I thought they would get around to changing it now.
"They" is me, and it's not changing. I'm not blowing a chance at
in-place upgrade to switch the integer-timestamp default.
> because RH really can't be used as a production PostgreSQL server (if
> date based data is important)
I have open bugs about the lack of in-place upgrade. I have never once
heard a customer complain about FP timestamps. So your position is
nonsense.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
