Dear postgres users,

I would like to set up a table that contains a 3D position, a time and a 
measured value, e.g. columns: x, y, z, t, val.

Does
bog-standard postgres (i.e. no PostGIS extension, if possible) provide
a way to index this table to allow the following 2 types of query to
be performed efficiently?

1. Select all the measurements in a given spatio-temporal box.

2. Select the N points nearest (in the euclidean/pythagorean sense) to a 
specified point.

If so, how do I define the correct index type, preferably in a manour which is 
supported by both postgres versions 7.4 and 8.*? The 7.4 manual suggests 
postgres can do an R-tree index, but 8.4's suggests that this kind of index has 
been subsumed within the GiST framework. Either way, I don't really know where 
to start.

I've played with PostGIS a couple of years ago, but, for the sake of 
installation simplicity,
I'd really prefer to avoid it--I don't require any of the fancier
geometry types, coordinate conversion or GIS functionality. And (back
then, at least) PostGIS didn't provide any inbuilt 'find nearest'
capability (probably because it would be very tricky to implement
efficiently if the geometries use ellipsoidal coordinates), although queries 
like (2), above, are easy to do quickly when you have an R-tree index of points 
in cartesian coordinates.

Nathaniel





-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

Reply via email to