Bruce, > would be "database system identification" - the rather unique ID of a
> > database installation. Third line in pg_controldata output: > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Datenbanksystemidentifikation: 5293702538224708457 > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Ah, good point. I don't see any SQL API for access to that value. The > value is used to make sure the xlogs match the server, and pg_resetxlog > will change that identifier. The value is generated from the > time-of-day that xlog is initialized at bootstrap time: > > gettimeofday(&tv, NULL); > sysidentifier = ((uint64) tv.tv_sec) << 32; > sysidentifier |= (uint32) (tv.tv_sec | tv.tv_usec); > > I am afraid the setting isn't as unique as you probably want. > > Why do you want the value and can we provide a better value for you? > > I have a central PostgreSQL installation. In addiotion PostgreSQL is installed on laptops. Those laptops are SOMETIMES connected to the central database. The databases on those laptops are (to some extend) replications of the central PostgreSQL database. Now I have to keep track of information like "Laptop xxx allready got the changes xxx"; esp. with DML-changes which get replicated. Challenge is to identify the entity "Laptop"... actually I have one table named "dbidentity", which gets populated with a GUID, and use this to mark the databases. Which has some potential for misstakes... so I am looking for something "hard-coded" into PostgreSQL to really identify two different databases (with rather the same content) via a single marker. So probably this identifier also gets resetted on pg_resetlxlog, and is not really what I would need :( (on the other hand: that system is running since 5 years on different machines an pg_resetxlog was not used one time :) ) Thanks for caring, Harald -- GHUM Harald Massa persuadere et programmare Harald Armin Massa Spielberger Straße 49 70435 Stuttgart 0173/9409607 no fx, no carrier pigeon - LASIK good, steroids bad?
