> Continuent works (AFAIK) like pgpool clustering, it sends the same
> statements to both/all servers in the cluster but it has no insight to the
> servers beyond this, so if via a direct connection server A becomes out of
> sync with server B then continuent is oblivious.

So can the same be said for pgpool then?


thanks,
-Alan

-- 
“Mother Nature doesn’t do bailouts.”
         - Glenn Prickett

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

Reply via email to