Tom Lane wrote: > Craig Ringer <cr...@postnewspapers.com.au> writes:
> Not sure how you tested that, but index_drop() clearly takes > AccessExclusiveLock on the table too. (I'm not sure it really needs > to --- the comment therein defending the reasoning seems out of date > --- but it definitely does.) I just re-checked, and indeed it does. I could've sworn my previous test only took a lock out on the index. Thanks for the catch. -- Craig Ringer -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
