Merlin Moncure <mmonc...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> wrote:
>> Yeah, we went over this on the spanish list, turned out that I couldn't
>> remember about syncscan :-)
> I like the new behavior. It really encourages proper use of order by,
> because the natural ordering results are effectively randomized. A
> class of subtle bugs has been made obvious. :)
Not really, because the syncscan behavior only kicks in when your table
gets large ... you'll never see it during devel testing on toy tables ...
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
