On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Or we could stick to the current behavior and say "use COALESCE() to > resolve the ambiguity, if you need to".
If there's no consensus on changing the behavior, it's probably better to be backward compatible than not. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
