"Albe Laurenz" <laurenz.a...@wien.gv.at> writes:
> Leonardo M. Ramé wrote:
>> I did what you suggested, and it responds with a 63 when the string is
>> "NU?NEZ" and 209 when it's "NUÑEZ".
> 63 is indeed a question mark. Since such a conversion would not be
> done by PostgreSQL, "something else" must convert Ñ to ?N *before*
> it gets into PostgreSQL...
Yeah, I think this destroys the theory that it's due to a wrong choice
of client_encoding setting. What you'd be likely to get from that is
a "character can't be translated" kind of error, not silent substitution
of a question mark. The damage must be getting done on the client side.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
