Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: > True, but the relative wakeup order of two different processes is not > important since by definition they are working on different > transactions. As long as the WAL writes for a single transaction (in a > single process) are not reordered you're fine.
I'm not totally sure, but I think I understand what you mean here, indipendent transactions by definition don't care about relative ordering. .TM. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
