On 2 Oct 2000, Gunnar R|nning wrote:
> Peter Mount <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >
> > For JDBC2, I'm planning (may get done for 7.1) an alternate ResultSet
> > class that uses cursors. This would speed things up as the entire
> > resultset isn't received in one go. That's the biggest bottleneck of them
> > all.
> >
>
> I would think this depends on the queries you execute. Is it any overhead on
> the backend side related to retrieving results through the use of
> cursors(ignoring the extra bytes sent) ?
Which is why it's an alternate class, not a replacement. The existing one
is for general use, but you can define the cursor name, so if you do for a
particular Statement object, then the ResultSet's from it would use that
cursor.
> If you only use a fragment of the data in the result set this method would
> of course be faster, but in other situations I'm concerned that you will
> only add overhead to the ResulSet.next() method(with familiy). But you
> mentioned alternate implementation, so that would probably mean that the
> user can choose the appropriate implementation for his application ?
Yes. The related methods are:
Statement.setCursorName(String name)
Statement.setFetchDirection(int direction)
Statement.setFetchSize(int rows)
The Statement.getResultSetType() method returns TYPE_FORWARD_ONLY for the
existing class, and TYPE_SCROLL_INSENSITIVE for the new one.
Peter
--
Peter T Mount [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.retep.org.uk
PostgreSQL JDBC Driver http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres/
Java PDF Generator http://www.retep.org.uk/pdf/
