* Matt Magoffin (postgresql....@msqr.us) wrote: > > I think it must be compiled 64-bit, or he'd not be able to get > > shared_buffers that high to start with. However, it's possible that the > > postmaster's been started under a ulimit setting that constrains each > > backend to just a few hundred meg of per-process memory. > > Here's the output of ulimit -a by the "postgres" user the database is > running under: [...] > I think this means it does not have an artificial memory limit imposed, > but is there a specific setting beyond these I could check do you think?
How about cat /proc/<pid>/limits for the postmaster?
And maybe:
status
stat
maps
Though I'm kinda grasping at straws here, to be honest. I've had PG up
and running through >16G of memory at a time before.
Thanks,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
