Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: > Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> writes: >> Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz wrote: >>> looks like it really has to be defined with "char" in double quotes. I >>> thought just char is enough... > >> They're different types. > > You know, maybe we should stop holding our noses and do something about > this old gotcha. That type's not going away anytime soon, but could we > rename it to char1 or something like that?
int1? -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com Ask me about EnterpriseDB's Slony Replication support! -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
