Francisco Figueiredo Jr. wrote:
About the memory issue of Npgsql, did you try to use a prepared
statement for this? We have some performance improvements when
handling bytea values but only when the NpgsqlCommand.Prepare() method
is called.
I hope it helps.
Hi Francisco,
Yes it did help. Thank you very much. (P.S. Npgsql is great!)
Thanks.
Howard Cole
www.selestial.com
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
