Tom Lane wrote:
> Karsten Hilbert <karsten.hilb...@gmx.net> writes:
> > This is what my 8.3 manual says:
> 
> > conkey ??? int2[] ??? pg_attribute.attnum ??? If a table constraint, list 
> > of columns which the constraint constrains ???
> 
> > From that I wouldn't have figured it'd apply to foreign keys
> > as well. So I assume it is fair to say that "foreign keys
> > are one type of table constraint", right ?
> 
> Right.  I think what the comment is actually trying to point out is that
> conkey isn't relevant to domain constraints, which also appear in
> pg_constraint.

Can someone come up with better documention wording for conkey?  I
can't:

        
http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/catalog-pg-constraint.html

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <br...@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

Reply via email to