Joshua D. Drake spaketh: > On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 12:51 -0700, Gregory Williamson wrote: > > Thom Brown wrote: > > <...> > > > I actually mentioned pgPool II to my boss earlier, and it's > > something we > > > will have to seriously consider, but will have to do some research > > first. <...> > > Using pgPool means we have a max limit of 100 and have almost never > > gone near it -- usually we have 12-25 connections at once and load and > > throughput are higher than they were before. > > Not to disparage pgPool, but we have also had great results with > pgBouncer.
I should have mentioned we quit while we ahead and never tried pgBouncer, which may be a better solution. (didn't meant to cast any mud!) And I realized belatedly that we use pgPool, a much simpler beast. We have looked at pgPool II but haven't implemented it. G
