"Guillaume Bog" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have performance issues if I do the following pseudo-query:
> SELECT a, b, (SELECT count(*) FROM t2 WHERE something) AS c
> FROM t1 ORDER BY a LIMIT 10;
> After some tests, it seems to me that the subquery on t2 is computed for all
> rows of t1.
Yeah. The SQL specification says that ORDER BY happens after computing
the SELECT output-list. In some cases that'll get optimized but you
can't count on it.
You can probably improve matters by using a sub-select:
SELECT a, b, (SELECT count(*) FROM t2 WHERE something) AS c
FROM ( SELECT a, b, ... FROM t1 ORDER BY a LIMIT 10 ) ss;
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
