On Thursday 20 November 2008 7:59:31 pm Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> So, to a first approximation, the PG list traffic has been constant > >> since 2000. Not the result I expected. > > > > I also was confused by its flatness. I am finding the email traffic > > almost impossible to continue tracking, so something different is > > happening, but it seems it is not volume-related. > > Yes, my perception also is that it's getting harder and harder to keep > up with the list traffic; so something is happening that a simple > volume count doesn't capture.
I am still relatively new to Postgres, but my impression is that the questions have gotten harder/more in depth. Fewer, How do you pronounce Postgres? and more, Explain the various isolation levels for transactions and how does that affect my particular situation? > > Does anyone have the data to break it down per mailing list? That might > yield some more insight. > > regards, tom lane -- Adrian Klaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
