Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> So, to a first approximation, the PG list traffic has been constant > >> since 2000. Not the result I expected. > > > I also was confused by its flatness. I am finding the email traffic > > almost impossible to continue tracking, so something different is > > happening, but it seems it is not volume-related. > > Yes, my perception also is that it's getting harder and harder to keep > up with the list traffic; so something is happening that a simple > volume count doesn't capture.
Agreed. I am struggling to put into words some of my angst, but I am concerned I will not be able to offer the same guarantees I have done in previous releases that every bug has been either fixed or added to the TODO list, and every submitted patch has been either applied or rejected. There, I said it. :-( -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
