On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 6:03 PM, Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Scott Marlowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Sounds kinda hand wavy to me. If compressed file systems didn't give >> you back what you gave them I couldn't imagine them being around for >> very long. > > I don't know, NFS has lasted quite a while. > > So you tell me, I write 512 bytes of data to a compressed filesystem, how does > it handle the torn page problem? Is it going to have to WAL log all data > operations again?
What is the torn page problem? Note I'm no big fan of compressed file systems, but I can't imagine them not working with databases, as I've seen them work quite reliably under exhange server running a db oriented storage subsystem. And I can't imagine them not being invisible to an application, otherwise you'd just be asking for trouble. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
