On Oct 29, 2008, at 9:50 PM, Grant Allen wrote:
One other thing I forgot to mention: Compression by the DB trumps filesystem compression in one very important area - shared_buffers! (or buffer_cache, bufferpool or whatever your favourite DB calls its working memory for caching data). Because the data stays compressed in the block/page when cached by the database in one of its buffers, you get more bang for you memory buck in many circumstances! Just another angle to contemplate :-)
The additional latency added by decompression is reasonably small compared with traditional disk access time. It's rather large compared to memory access time.
Cheers, Steve -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
