Hi All, I was in fact out-of-date with patches, and have fixed that - which has brought the zone files up to date.
Will definitely be looking to upgrade all servers to 8.3 at some stage soon - all about scheduling outages and testing code before we do... Thanks for everyone's help appreciate it. Cheers, Craig On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 3:29 AM, Scott Marlowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 10:23 AM, Roderick A. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Scott Marlowe wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Roderick A. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> Tom Lane wrote: > >>> CentOS 5 -- three, four, or maybe more, updates this year so far. :-) > >>> > >>> Is there a way to determine from a binary install (Devrim GÜNDÜZ's > rpms) > >>> if > >>> it uses the system timezone data or the build-in copy? Heck I'll just > >>> look > >>> at the src rpm. > >> > >> Centos (i.e RHEL) definitely updates tzdata. I'm pretty sure the PGDG > >> rpms use the built in tzdata. > > > > Thanks Scott. I was pretty sure of this but I've never had a reason or > > excuse to test or even think about it. Well so far. Murphy's Law is > bound > > to come into play real soon. :-) > > I run pg 8.3.3 (update to 8.3.4 is planned in the next week or so) on > centos 5.2 myself. While a lot of packages, including other dbs, make > some insane changes mid stream on stable releases, pgsql generally > doesn't. Big changes only happen when the new major version comes > out, so keeping up to date is a pretty safe bet on pgsql. > > -- > Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general > -- Craig Ayliffe
