MG>comments prefixed with MG>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Drupal and PostgreSQL - performance issues?
> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; pgsql-general@postgresql.org
>
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 8:56 PM, Scott Marlowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 3:40 AM, Ivan Sergio Borgonovo
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 20:45:39 -0600
> >> "Joshua Tolley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Premise:
> >> I'm not sustaining that the "default" answers are wrong, but they are
> >> inadequate.
> >> BTW the OP made a direct comparison of pgsql and mysql running
> >> drupal. That's a bit different than just asking: how can I improve
> >> PostgreSQL performances.
> >
> > Sadly, no one has run any meaningful benchmarks so far.
>
> Not sure about "meaningful", but:
> http://2bits.com/articles/benchmarking-postgresql-vs-mysql-performance-using-drupal-5x.html
> Their attached config file shows a relatively untuned postgresql
> config, but in *Drupal's* case, I'm not sure how else tweaking the
> config would help when it shows: "Executed 99 queries in 67.81
> milliseconds." which in itself is not too shabbly, but that points
> towards Drupal's inclination to issue a *lot* of small, simple
> queries.
MG>default behaviour of ISAM DB's
>
> > Actually the most common answer is to ask them if they've actually
> > used a realistic benchmark. Then tune.
>
> The benchmark is a mostly read-only Drupal site -- a few admins, but a
> lot of readers. Drupal as a benchmark is skewed towards lots and lots
> of small, simple queries, which MyISAM excels at. The long term fix
> ought to be to help the Drupal team to make it
MG>What about INNODB is Drupal forgetting the default engine for 5.x?
>
> The front page of one my site, even with some caching turned on, but
> with a logged in user, shows 389 queries just to generate it, mostly
> consisting of queries like "SELECT dst FROM url_alias WHERE src =
> '$link' AND language IN('en', '') ORDER BY language DESC". Explain
> analyze shows that postgresql happily uses the index to grab the
> correct value, in less than 0.04 ms. But it's still not fast enough,
> esp. when Drupal stupidly issues some of the exact same queries up to
> 9 times!
MG>isnt this in query_cache..why is Drupal going braindead on this item?
>
> This, to me, is clearly some thing to be fixed at Drupal's level.
> Joshua Drake is on the right path -- helping the Drupal folks treat
> the database as a database instead of a blind data store. This is
> something I'm working on as well on Drupal's code base, but it looks
> like it wouldn't be making to the mainstream Drupal release anything
> soon as the changes are too drastic.
MG>From what i've been reading the author doesnt work on drupal anymore
MG>If we could get access to the php source maybe we could fix this..?
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
_________________________________________________________________
Get more out of the Web. Learn 10 hidden secrets of Windows Live.
http://windowslive.com/connect/post/jamiethomson.spaces.live.com-Blog-cns!550F681DAD532637!5295.entry?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_domore_092008
