ok,
you calculate headline() 19861 times, while you need only 20.
Use subselect and will be surprized
Oleg
On Thu, 2 Oct 2008, Matthew Terenzio wrote:
Thanks Tom, Sorry if that last post went over multiple times. I was getting
a mailing failure (or so I thought)
here is EXPLAIN ANALYZE . I really need to work on my skills at analyzing
these:
Limit (cost=105505.78..105505.83 rows=20 width=655) (actual
time=74806.973..74807.037 rows=20 loops=1)
-> Sort (cost=105505.78..105555.44 rows=19861 width=655) (actual
time=74806.968..74806.989 rows=20 loops=1)
Sort Key: stories."timestamp"
-> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..90497.94 rows=19861 width=655)
(actual time=720.251..74798.672 rows=680 loops=1)
-> Function Scan on q (cost=0.00..12.50 rows=1000
width=32) (actual time=0.013..0.017 rows=1 loops=1)
-> Index Scan using description_index on stories
(cost=0.00..90.14 rows=20 width=623) (actual time=700.633..63243.713
rows=680 loops=1)
Index Cond: (stories.vectors @@ "outer".q)
Total runtime: 74847.177 ms
Regards,
Oleg
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, Research Scientist, Head of AstroNet (www.astronet.ru),
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University, Russia
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(495)939-16-83, +007(495)939-23-83
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
