2008/9/27 Douglas McNaught <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Mark Mielke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> If >> some parts of PostgreSQL are not performance bottlenecks, and they are >> extremely complicated to write in C, and very easy to write in something >> else common and simple (I've never used LUA myself?), I imagine it would be >> acceptable to the community. > > As long as they can expose their interfaces using the standard PG > function call interface, and use the documented SPI mechanism to talk > to the rest of the back end. Stuff that hooks into undocumented or > unstable parts of the code would be much less viable. > > -Doug > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers >
I think that C is the best language for Postgresql. C++ has a little thinks that make not good for performance. Why people want to make more understable code touching the language?. Simplify documentation for programmmers. Thats was the idea in the beggining. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
