On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 14:21 -0400, Michael Nolan wrote:
> Recently I discovered a coding error of mine in a trigger that is
> called only for deletes.
>
> I was returning NEW instead of OLD.
>
> Since NEW is undefined when deleting a row, it was failing and the row
> wasn't being deleted.
In PL/pgSQL, NEW is NULL for BEFORE DELETE triggers. It doesn't appear
to be obviously documented that this is the case (which is, I assume,
why you said it is undefined), and I agree that it can cause confusion.
> However, it was failing silently. Shouldn't this have recorded an
> error or warning somewhere?
This is a feature, not a bug. Sometimes you don't want to delete a
record, and returning NULL is the way to do that.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
