On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 5:56 AM, Robert Treat
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 September 2008 17:21:12 Asko Oja wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 2:09 AM, Michael Nolan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Oracle handles connecting to multiple databases (even on
> multiple/remote
> > > computers) fairly seamlessly, PG does not (yet.)
> >
> > Stuff we do with plProxy on PostgreSQL is in some respects more advanced
> > than anything Oracle has to offer :) We have hundreds of databases in
> quite
> > complex network of remote calls and replication.
> >
>
> Yes, but it is also far more complex to install, configure, and use,
> compared
> to something simple like oracle's dblink, which comes pre-installed, is
> simple to set-up, and has a much more straight-forward syntax for use in
> day
> to day query work.
>
We are working on these matters and hopefully get some of them solved in 8.4
:)
Configure and use part is NO more complex than Oracle and has several use
cases for which neither of dblinks is suitable.
Or are you claiming that calling functions is not straight forward and
seamless in PostgreSQL.
But yes getting plProxy into the database might be the hurdle for many
potential users.
>
> --
> Robert Treat
> Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
>
