Scott Marlowe wrote: > On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 8:43 PM, Troy Rasiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Sorry for bringing up an old post...If you have a generic set of tables.. >> >> eg. table of countries / post codes etc which are used across several >> databases what is the best way to access / store them? >> I currently >> - use dblink to create views when i want to do joins, >> OR >> - i just open up a separate db handle when i just want to display the >> data (via a perl script) from the 'generic database' (eg. a select list >> of countries) >> >> but was wondering whether schema's would apply to me as well ? > > Yes, schemas would be much better. The nice thing is with > search_path, you could have a setup where application1 and > application2 live in different schemas but have access to a common > schema. When running app1, you'd do something like: > > set search_path='app1','commonschema'; > > and when running app2 you'd change the app1 up there to app2 and then > you could access the tables in both schemas without having to use > prefixes.
Thanks Scott. We currently do websites for different customers on the same machine so we have been setting each of them up with individual (database,user,pass). Instead should i be setting them all up in the one database and having individual schema's for each customer and then only granting each user access to their schema & the proposed 'commonschema' ? -- Troy Rasiah -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
