Dushyanth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Tom Lane <tgl <at> sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
>> Then the only other possibility is that autovacuum is being launched to
>> prevent XID wraparound.  Are there any tables in that database with
>> particularly old relfrozenxid?

> Below are the unique age(relfrozenxid) values that i see from the above query

> 140835139
> 150945753
> 185741480

Hmph.  Does pg_database.datfrozenxid agree with that?

                        regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

Reply via email to