"Kynn Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Actually, the DB I have in mind would certainly be approaching "silly
> territory." I'm looking at a schema with around 10 thousand tables (or
> views). Unfortunately, as far as I can tell,
> http://www.postgresql.org/about/ says nothing about maximum number of
> tables.
There is no hard limit (at least not till you hit the 16TB size limit on
pg_class or pg_attribute...). In practice this number tends to be
constrained by the operating system, not Postgres. How well does your
OS do with tens of thousands of entries in a single directory?
Generally, though, schema designs like this amount to manually replacing
leading columns of an index key with separate tables, and they're
usually bad style and a PITA to work with. If you have a desperate need
to partition the data then you might have to go that way, but you should
think twice.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
